Dangers of a Reverse Mortgage
Many seniors have considered a reverse mortgage to help support them in their golden years, but are not aware of the pitfalls associated with this type of loan. You may even be surprised to learn that the rules have changed, leaving some elderly homeowners at risk of losing their homes.
Reverse mortgages are supposed to protect seniors from economic hardship, paying older homeowners a regular sum against their property’s equity. Now, due to a 2008 rule change by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, surviving spouses can be excluded, leaving them at risk of being displaced due to foreclosure upon the death of their spouse. AARP, the seniors’ organization, recently filed suit against HUD, asserting that recent policy changes are pushing older unsuspecting homeowners into foreclosure.
Reverse mortgages were intended to be non-recourse loans. This means that the most a borrower can lose is the house itself, even if the value of the property goes down. In this market, nearly 25% of all homes with mortgages are worth less than they owe, making them nearly impossible to sell.
Lenders sometimes encourage only the elder member of a couple to put his or her name on the mortgage because then the payout is greater. What they fail to disclose to the couple is that when the older spouse passes, the loan becomes due and payable in full.
In one such case, reported in the New York Times, the Robert and Ophelia Bennett secured a reverse mortgage. The new mortgage, intended to secure this couple’s future, instead helped destroy it. They paid $20,000 in fees but received only $1,800 in cash.
Mr. Bennett said he did not realize that his new mortgage had taken his name off the title of the home, which the couple had owned together since 1981.
Mrs. Bennett, who was a decade senior to her husband, died shortly after the new mortgage went into effect. The payments immediately stopped and the mortgage became due and payable.
The lender began foreclosure proceedings and scheduled a sale of the property last month.
If HUD had not changed the rules, the suit says, Mr. Bennett would have been allowed to live in the house until his death.
I can’t stress enough how important it is to work with a team you can trust to avoid such tragedies to your family. If you have ever considered a reverse mortgage or have questions about any real estate topics, please feel free to contact me.
Popularity: 12% [?]
